J. Alan Diehl
454 BRB II/III
Bluemle Bldg. - Room 609
233 S. 10th St.
Eric J. Brown
514 BRB II/III
316 Hill Pavilion
204I Carolyn Lynch Laboratory
John P. Lynch
167 Johnson Pavilion
When: Wednesdays 1:00-3:00 PM
Where: 1201 BRB II/III
This is a seminar course, with an additional requirement for a short (review) paper. Each week one or two students will present a seminal paper in the field. The student will first present a brief history of the topic (see list of topics below) and establish why the work was done. The paper will then be analyzed, figure-by-figure through student involvement. A summary will be made of the important findings. Unanswered questions and directions for future work will be presented, accompanied by class discussion. A designated faculty member (coach) will meet with the student before the presentation to offer advice and help ensure that the topic is addressed well, for the benefit of the presenter and the rest of the students. The same faculty member will attend the presentation and provide feedback. A short review of recent important papers on a topic germane to the course will be written and turned in at the end of the course.
The course topics are chosen to familiarize the student with the key principles, the most productive experimental systems, and the seminal studies from an exciting past twenty years of cell cycle research. Illustrations will be made of how cancer can develop from perturbations of cell cycle regulation. The topics unfold by focusing initially on major classes of cell cycle regulatory proteins, mechanisms of regulation, and critical cell cycle transitions. We will then consider deregulation of the cell cycle in cancer.
Date Topic Faculty coach Student(s)
9/9/09 Orientation Steve McMahon
9/16/09 CDK/Cyclins Rick Assoian
9/23/09 G1/S-RB-E2F Jake Kushner
9/30/09 S-phase Alan Diehl
10/7/09 Spindle assembly checkpoint Michael Lampson
10/14/09 Fall Break
10/21/09 Transcription/Cell cycle Steve McMahon
10/28/09 Cip/Kip regulators Alan Diehl
11/4/09 Proteolysis Serge Fuchs
11/11/09 Cellular proliferation in tissue homeostasis Jake Kushner
11/18/09 Ink4a John Lynch
11/25/09 DNA damage checkpoints Eric Brown
12/2/09 No class (work on papers)
12/9/09 Papers due
a) A student will be asked to volunteer to give the first presentation and will receive, in turn, the gratitude of the directors and browny points. Copies of all papers for presentation will be available on the blackboard. Once the enrollment is finalized, students will be randomly assigned presentation topics covering the rest of the course. If the date confers an unusual hardship you may ask the directors to switch. Presentations should be in the form of a power point presentation.
b) We will supply you with a short list of suggested references and reviews for each topic by the 2nd class meeting. Focus the presentation on one or two (related) papers depending upon topic. If you would like to present a paper that is not on the list, please get approval in advance from the faculty coach. You must choose your paper more than a week before your presentation to provide your fellow students with ample opportunity to read and evaluate the chosen paper.
c) You can talk to us at any point as you choose your paper or try to understand the paper. However, your final discussion with us should be no later than Friday prior to your presentation date, at a mutually agreed upon time. You must have your talk and slides (powerpoint) prepared prior to going into this meeting. The more you prepare yourself first, the more you learn and the more we can help you and ensure good coverage of the field for the class.
d) Students will anonymously evaluate each presentation. This feedback will be given directly to the presenter, and will not be used in grading. On the day you present, you are to stay after class and meet with assigned faculty for feedback.
We encourage students to make a handout for the class on their presentation topic.
We seek to foster a supportive atmosphere in the class while maintaining scientific rigor, keeping people engaged, and learning as much as possible. Asking questions and making comments helps the presenter know if he/she is getting through. In addition, listening actively, assimilating scientific material, and asking questions that clarify or stimulate thought are useful scientific skills that can be honed by practice. There are no bad questions at this stage of your careers and admitting some ignorance is better in the long run than papering it over. If you are unsure about something, chances are others are as well. To underscore these notions, we include participation as a significant part of the final grade. Students should read the paper carefully in advance of the class. Everyone is expected to actively participate in the discussion each week.
In addition to active participation in the context of the paper presentation, questions relating to the paper (technical, philosophical etc) are encouraged. Active listening, assimilation of scientific material and asking questions that clarify or stimulate thought are useful scientific skills that can be honed by practice. There are no bad questions at this stage of your careers and admitting some ignorance is better in the long run than papering it over. If you are unsure about something, chances are others are as well. Students should read the paper carefully in advance of the class.
Use a ‘preview’ format (see instructions to authors “Cancer Cell or Molecular Cell” journal)
A. Choosing a topic
The topic must be different from your lab research and from your own presentation and should not focus primarily on a paper presented in class, but can be on the same topic.
The review should focus on articles from journals of the highest quality (Cell, Cancer Cell, Developmental Cell, Molecular Cell, Genes & Development, Nature, Science, Nature Genetics, Nature Cell Biology, Current Biology, EMBOJ. Any other journals must first be ok’d by course directors.)
Read several primary papers and focus your review on one or two of the most recent publications that address the topic, controversy or question you have chosen. You can also read recent reviews to help you recognize which questions are unanswered or controversial. Write the paper discussing these papers in the paper format outlined below.
B. Format (Preview for Cancer Cell or Molecular Cell): Use format instructions for preview found under instructions to authors on the Cancer Cell or Molecular Cell website.
In general, you should provide a brief introduction for the topic citing the paper or papers previewed in the first paragraph. Discuss 1-3 primary papers (that cover the same topic and should have been published within the same time frame). You can read and cite reviews, but you should not simply rewrite a review: exercise your own scholarship. Critically analyze the results. Formulate an opinion on whether the conclusions are scientifically supported, what is the significance of the paper in the context of the field, and what issues remain. Lastly, propose experiments that will address open issues. This is designed in part to give you practice for your preliminary exams.
C. Due date: 12/9.Note again that papers (available for presentation) will be available on blackboard