Release Date: May 8, 2017
Expiration Date: May 8, 2020
Amount of CME credit: 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™
Amount of Nursing Contact Hours: 0.75 Contact Hours
Estimated Length of Time for Completion: approximately 0.75 hour
Children's Roles in Medical Decisions explores the three primary ways in which older children and teenagers can influence or control their medical care. It examines the ethics and law of emancipated and mature minors, and describes the ethical and practical challenges of children’s assent.
This continuing education activity has been designed for physicians, nurses, psychosocial clinicians, and others who work with children in medical contexts.
By the end of this course, learners will be able to:
- Define the concepts of an emancipated and mature minor.
- Describe the implications for medical decision-making when an adolescent is emancipated.
- Explain how the mature minor doctrine is grounded in state law.
- Discuss the notion of assent and its application to decision-making in pediatrics.
In this activity, learners will engage with the content by moving through a series of brief video lectures with links to related readings, downloadable resources, and quizzes.
The Structure of the Course
This course is divided into three lectures:
- Mature Minors (8:16)
- Emancipated Minors (11:26)
- Assent (11:36)
Each lecture includes a list of suggested readings that provide more detail about what was discussed. Links to external readings will lead you to an abstract or, if available, the full article.
Successful completion of this educational activity and receipt of certificate of credit includes achieving a minimum score of 80% on the post-test.
Steven Joffe, MD, MPH
Emanuel & Robert Hart Associate Professor of Medical Ethics & Health Policy
Vice–Chair, Medical Ethics Division
Associate Professor of Pediatrics
Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
Accreditation and Designation of Credit
The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
This activity has been designated by the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania for 0.75 hours of Patient Safety/Risk Management.
Penn Medicine Nursing is an approved provider of continuing nursing education by the Pennsylvania State Nurses Association, an accredited approver by the American Nurses Credentialing Center’s Commission on Accreditation. Approval # 124-3-H-15.
Penn Medicine Nursing awards this activity 0.75 contact hours.
AAPA accepts certificates of participation for educational activities certified for AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™ from organizations accredited by ACCME or a recognized state medical society. PAs may receive a maximum of 0.75 Category 1 credits for completing this activity.
The following planning committee member has reported the following relevant financial relationships with commercial interests related to the content of this educational activity:
Ezekiel J. Emanuel, MD, PhD: Leigh Bureau, Speaker Honorarium; Oak HC/FT, Salary; Nuna, Stock Shareholder
The faculty and planning committee members listed below have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships with any commercial interests related to the content of this educational activity:
Steven Joffe, MD, MPH
Autumn Fiester, PhD
Dominic A. Sisti, PhD
Connie Ulrich, PhD, MSN
Amy Ashbridge, MBA
Adam Zolkover, MA
Laura C. Hart, MFA
Mila Kostic, CHCP, FACEHP
Michael Schoen, PhD
Rodman Campbell, CHCP
Patricia Smith, DNP, RN, BC
The faculty reported that there will be no mention of investigational and/or off-label use of products in this presentation.
To receive your Certificate of Credit for participating in this CME/CE-certified educational curriculum, we ask that you follow these steps:
- Read all the introductory material including faculty and disclosure information
- Complete the pre-activity survey
- Review the video lectures, references and resources
- VIDEO TIPS
- To view English captioning, select the CC button on the video player.
- To watch at a faster or slower playback speed, select the "Click to view directly on the web" link and select the appropriate link.
- Android and iOS devices may display closed captions inconsistently. For the best mobile experience with captions, we recommend logging in using Chrome or Firefox mobile, and viewing videos through the embedded Canvas player rather than directly on the web.
- After you have completed the above steps, proceed to completion of the post-activity survey. A passing score of 80% is required.
- Evaluate the course using the brief survey on the last page. You must complete the post activity evaluation to receive your certificate. The certificate will automatically generate after completing the survey.
Acknowledgment of Commercial Support
There was no commercial support used in the development of this educational activity.
For CME/CNE related questions regarding this activity, contact the Office of CME and IPCE at Penn Medicine at firstname.lastname@example.org or at 215-898-8005.
By clicking on Register Now, I acknowledge that I have read the CME/CE information.
Meet the Faculty
Steven Joffe, MD, MPH
Steven Joffe, MD, MPH, is the Emanuel and Robert Hart Associate Professor of Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine. He serves as Vice-Chair of the Department, leading the medical ethics division, and directs the Penn Fellowship in Advanced Biomedical Ethics. He is also Associate Professor of Pediatrics at the Perelman School and Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP). He attended Harvard College, received his medical degree from the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), and received his public health degree from UC Berkeley. He trained in pediatrics at UCSF and undertook fellowship training in pediatric hematology/oncology at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Boston Children’s Hospital, and was a Fellow in Professional Ethics at the Safra Center at Harvard. Prior to coming to Penn, he served on the faculty of Harvard Medical School, and was an attending pediatric oncologist at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Boston Children’s Hospital, for 13 years.
Dr. Joffe’s research addresses the many ethical challenges that arise in the conduct of clinical and translational investigation and in genomic medicine, both in pediatric oncology and other areas of medicine and science. He has been the principal investigator (PI) of NIH, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), and foundation-funded studies that examine the roles and responsibilities of PIs in multicenter randomized trials, accountability in the clinical research enterprise, governance of learning activities within learning healthcare systems, return of individual genetic results to participants in epidemiologic cohort studies, and the integration of genomic sequencing technologies into cancer care. He has also lectured widely on research ethics and on the ethical, legal, and social implications of genomic technologies. He was previously a member of the Department of Health and Human Services Secretary’s Advisory Committee for Human Research Protections and a member of the National Academy of Sciences Committee on Federal Research Regulations and Reporting Requirements. Currently, he serves as Chair of the Children’s Oncology Group Bioethics Committee and as a member of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Pediatrics Ethics Subcommittee.
In his teaching within the Department's online educational initiatives, Dr. Joffe aims to convey a deep understanding of the ethical principles underlying research, while guiding students in how to apply those principles to real-world problems. He hopes students will take one core lesson from his teaching: it is possible to conduct studies on questions relevant to policy and practice that are both experimentally rigorous and ethically respectful of the rights and interests of the individuals who take part.