faculty photo

Wayne William Hancock

Professor of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
Department: Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Contact information
916B Abramson Research Center
3615 Civic Center Blvd.
Philadelphia, PA 19104-4318
Office: (215) 590-8709
Fax: (215) 590-7384
Graduate Group Affiliations
Education:
M.B.B.S. (Medicine)
Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia, 1977.
Ph.D. (Medicine)
Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia, 1984.
F.R.C.P.A. (Pathology)
Royal College o fPathologists of Australasia, 1989.
Permanent link
 

Description of Research Expertise

Research Interests

Transplant immunobiology, inflammation and mechanisms of disease

Research Summary

New Co-Stimulation Molecules And Their Function In Vivo
The world is currently awash with costimulation molecules. Individual labs tout this or that molecule as being key to T cell activation under specific (often ludicrously specific) conditions, but none of these "insights" have yet led to actual therapeutic agents in clinical use. This reflects several factors. Drug companies make drugs and then try and find an application for them, ideally rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, asthma or some other widespread disease involving long-term therapy, but certainly not any of the indications subject to the "too small a market (e.g. <$200 million dollars/year)" rule. Biologics are difficult and expensive to develop. Hence, the science underlying all the costimulation hype needs to examined critically if progress is to be achieved. Rather than adding more and more costimulation molecules to the list and thinking they are all equally important such that the Immunology Today-type diagrams in peoples' minds becomes more and more complicated, some reality testing is called for, and may thereby lead to new therapeutic approaches. Transplant models provide particularly advantageous systems to test the importance of such costimulation pathways using knockouts and blocking monoclonal antibodies and fusion proteins. We are currently investigating ICOS/B&RP-1; PD-1 and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2; B7-H3; BTLA and B7-H4; and several TNF/TNF-R superfamily pathways, i.e. those molecules which constitute the "next wave" on which immunologic hopes, careers and dreams typically seem to be pinned upon but which in this case, as a bonus, may also be "true".

Chemokines/chemokine receptors in allograft rejection vs. tolerance
If all the world is a stage than an organ transplant is from an immunologic perspective a gothic masterpiece wherein every component of the immune system boils and pokes its way into the limelight at some point or another and the challenge is to make sense of it all. Chemokines are small molecular weight chemotactic cytokines which bind and signal via G protein-coupled seven-transmembrane receptors expressed by most cell types. Of special interest to immunologists are those chemokine receptors which mediate T cell recirculation as well as those which mediate attraction to sites of immune stimulation, such as an organ transplant. This field has its problems, not the least of which is its dreaded new nomenclature which has only served to decrease rather than improve communication. Suffice to say that despite there being over 45 chemokines and at least 18 chemokine receptors, with countless assertions of biologic redundancy and "promiscuous" binding (which sound interesting but isn't in this case), the development and testing of knockout mice and availability of neutralizing mAbs for use in wild-type controls has provided some sense of insight into how these pathways work in vivo. Of the various pathways involved in allograft responses, the most important seems to be CXCR3, which is expressed by NK cells and activated T cells, and has 3 ligands: IP-10, Mig and I-TAC. Blockade of CXCR3 has a particularly powerful effect in reducing host alloresponses. The second most important appears to be CCR5, whose ligands are many but include MIP-1a, MIP-1b and RANTES. We continue to investigate the importance of these and additional chemokine/chemokine receptor pathways in experimental and clinical studies.

Selected Publications

Wang L, Liu Y, Beier UH, Han R, Bhatti TR, Akimova T, Hancock WW.: Foxp3+ T regulatory cells require DNA methyltransferase 1 expression to prevent development of lethal autoimmunity. Blood In press, 2013.

Chunder N, Wang L, Chen C, Hancock WW, Wells AD.: Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 controls peripheral immune tolerance. Journal of Immunology 189: 5659-5666, 2012.

Miyahara Y, Khattar M, Schroder PM, Mierzejewska B, Deng R, Han R, Hancock WW, Chen W, Stepkowski SM. : Anti-TCRβ mAb induces long-term allograft survival by reducing antigen-reactive T cells and sparing regulatory T-cells. American Journal of Transplantation Page: doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04006.x. 2012.

Liu Y, Wang L, Han R, Beier UH, Hancock WW. : Two lysines in the forkhead domain of Foxp3 are key to T regulatory cell function. PLoS One 7: e29035, 2012.

Miyahara Y, Khattar M, Schroder PM, Mierzejewska B, Deng R, Han R, Hancock WW, Chen W, Stepkowski SM. : Anti-TCRβ mAb induces long-term allograft survival by reducing antigen-reactive T cells and sparing regulatory T-cells. American Journal of Transplantation Page: doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04006.x. 2012.

O’Connor RS, Hao X, Shen K, Bashour K, Akimova T, Hancock WW, Kam L, Milone MC. : Substrate rigidity regulates human T cell activation and proliferation. Journal of Immunology Page: in press, 2012.

Kalin JH, Butler KV, Akimova T, Hancock WW, Kozikowski AP.: Second-generation histone deacetylase 6 inhibitors enhance the immunosuppressive effects of Foxp3+ T-regulatory cells. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 55: 639-651, 2012.

Song X, Li B, Xiao Y, Wang Q, Liu Y, Chen C, Gao Y, Berezov A, Xu C, Wu SL, Li Y, Bembas K, Cai Z, Zhang H, Karger B, Wells AD, Hancock WW, Zhou Z, Greene MI. : Structural and biological features of FOXP3 dimerization relevant to regulatory T cell function. Cell Reports Page: in press, 2012.

Bizargity P, Liu K, Wang L, Hancock WW, Visner GA. : Inhibitory effects of pirfenidone on dendritic cells and lung allograft rejection. Transplantation Page: In press, 2012.

Akimova T, Kamath BM, Goebel JW, Meyers KEC, Rand EB, Hawkins A, Levine MH, Bucuvalas JC, Hancock WW.: Differing effects of rapamycin or calcineurin inhibitor on T-regulatory cells in pediatric liver and kidney transplant recipients. American Journal of Transplantation 12: 3449-3461, 2012.

back to top
Last updated: 04/19/2013
The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania